top of page

Search for a specific topic or youth author you're looking for

55 results found with an empty search

  • Publication 3B | 901LawReview

    "Vanishing Libraries" By: Sofia Su Collierville, Tennessee _________________ Introduction The argument that physical books should be replaced by digital books is one of efficiency, and on that metric, it is flawless. Digital texts are searchable, portable, and cost-effective. Yet, this logic mistakes the function of a book for its purpose. A book’s purpose is not merely to transmit information, but to facilitate a particular state of mind—one we cannot afford to lose. Analysis A physical book is a temporal anchor. Its weight in your hands, the texture of its paper, and your progress through its pages create a relationship build on time and thought. You cannot, with a frantic flick of the finger, skim Pride and Prejudice. You are forced to reckon with its scale, to feel the heft of its digressions. This physicality imposes a patience that digital media actively subverts. The hyperlink, the notification, the seductive ease of switching tabs—these are the architecture of a distracted mind. The codex, by contrast, is a technology for sustained, deep attention. It builds a silent, sacred chamber for thought in a world of cognitive noise. Furthermore, a physical book is an historical artifact of a singular intellectual journey. My used copy of The Prince is not the same as the one on a screen. It is scarred with my own frantic marginalia, but also with the faint, penciled-in notes of a previous reader—a stranger with whom I now argue and occasionally agree across decades. This creates a palimpsest of interpretation; a community of readers bound in a single object. A digital file is sterile and universal while a physical book is unique, bearing the material evidence of its own life in the world. To replace the physical book with the digital imposter is to believe that the medium is a neutral vessel. It is not. The medium shapes the conversation we have with the text itself. Conclusion By substituting physical books with online imitations, we are not just phasing out paper and ink; we are phasing out a specific, irreplaceable ecology of the mind—one that cultivates depth, patience, and a connection to the lineage of human ideas. In our rush toward a more efficient future, we must be careful not to optimize away the very conditions for positive association and concentration. Bibliography MiddleWeb. (2025, December 9). Reigniting the magic of reading physical books. https://www.middleweb.com/52885/re-igniting-the-magic-of-reading-physical-books/ Barshay, J. (2022, August 29). Proof points: Paper books linked to stronger readers in an international study. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-paper-books-linked-to-stronger-readers-in-an-international-study/ comments debug Commenting Forum Please be respectful and constructive Please be respectful and constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 8B | 901LawReview

    "The Evolution of the Diamond Industry" By: Devin McNeil & Nandini K. Collierville, Tennessee _________________ Introduction        Diamonds, often deemed as the most precious stone on Earth, are formed from solid, crystalline forms of carbon, made deep under the earth’s mantle, before being brought to the surface through volcanic eruptions. Diamonds serve a dual process from its industrial benefits centered on polishing and cutting material due to its durability, and its luxury purposes such as crafting fine jewelry and other ornaments. While widely sought after for its rarity and beauty, the means of cultivating these precious stones is often far less pure than the gem itself. The complex paradox of the Diamond industry is a captivating one, balancing both the economic benefits and cultural aspects with a prolonged history of human rights violation and the contemporary task of challenging synthetic alternatives. Background        Diamonds have had a long history. The world’s love of diamonds started in India, where diamonds were gathered from the rivers and streams. Historians estimate that India was trading diamonds as early as the fourth century BC (Shigley 2019). The country’s resources yielded limited amount for an equally limited market, this did eventually change as the caravans traveled to Venice’s medieval markets. By the 1400’s, diamonds became a fashionable piece for Europe’s most elite and wealthiest. That, however, was not the only use for diamonds; many would cut and engrave on said material and used them as talismans to ward off evil and provide protection. Key Events        The late 1800s South African Diamond Rush led to the discovery of the Kimberley pipe, educing a massive influx of prospectors to the region, and ultimately resulting in the consolidation of diamonds mining by Cecil Rhodes’s De Beers Consolidated Mines in 1888. To control the increasing diamond supply, De Beers formed a cartel with distributors to limit production and artificially inflate prices. “A diamond is forever” behind this phrase stands De Beers, they didn’t just sell gems; it created one of the most important campaigns in history. By the 1930s, diamonds were extremely common; De Beers had access to a vast supply but needed a way to ensure that the stones would fetch high prices. They created a plan that they needed to equate diamonds with love and eternity, coming up with the rule that men should spend at least one month’s salary on an engagement ring to truly show their commitment. This would bring in money without actually specifying a dollar amount, tying it to each person’s individual earnings. The Blood Diamond Conflict        The Diamond Industry is no stranger to the concept of human rights abuse and often loses its sense of ethics and morals. This has led to the development of the term “Blood Diamonds” or “Conflict Diamonds” which bore from the unethical practice of using these stones to finance conflicts against governments. The trade of these diamonds has fueled brutal civil wars and severe human rights abuses in several African nations. Rebel groups have systematically used diamond profits to purchase weapons, continuing cycles of violence and instability within communities. The extraction process itself often involves horrific practices like forced labor and the mutilation of civilians. To combat this issue, what is known as “The Kimberly Process” was implemented in 2003 to prevent the trade of these conflict diamonds. Today, traders must certify that diamond shipments are free from conflict diamonds to before they may practice their trade. Modern Market Trends and Synthetic Diamonds        According to the U.S. Global Diamond Market, lab grown diamonds have gained popularity because it can be sourced ethically, costed less to produce, and exerted less harm towards the environment. The lab grown diamond market was valued at 14.2 billion USD in 2023 and is expected to grow to 29.3 billion USD by 2033 (Pangarkar 2025). While preserving the same quality and durability as an authentic diamond, these synthetic stones avoid the common issues faced with traditional mining: human right’s abuse, unsustainable mining processes, and inaccessibility due to high costs. This practice makes diamonds accessible to wider population by generating significantly lower and more affordability prices in a moral manner. Consumers should be encouraged to check beforehand that they are purchasing diamonds from ethically sourced businesses or even consider acquiring their precious stones from a lab grown diamond market. Conclusion        Diamonds have a complex history, starting in ancient India before medieval European demand and the south African diamond rush in the late 1800s led to cartel systems to manage supply and inflate prices through marketing campaigns like engagement rings. The industry faces many ethical challenges related to the “blood diamond” trade. However, with the recent cultivation of modern lab grown diamonds, which is chemically related but often more affordable, the diamond industry is beginning to flip to a new chapter. Consumers play a crucial role by considering the origins of diamonds and looking for the lab-grown alternative to address these ethical complexities. Bibliography : A Review of the Political and Economic Forces Shaping Today’s Diamond Industry | Gems & Gemology. Www.gia.edu , www.gia.edu/gems-gemology/fall-2005-political-economic-forces-diamond-shor. Armstrong, Paul. What Are “Conflict Diamonds?" CNN, 5 Dec. 2011, edition.cnn.com/2011/12/05/world/africa/conflict-diamonds-explainer. Uses of Diamonds - Mining for Schools. Miningforschools.co.za, 2022, miningforschools.co.za/lets-explore/diamond/uses-of-diamonds. https://www.capetowndiamondmuseum.org/about-diamonds/south-african-diamond-history/ GIA. Diamond History and Lore. Gia.edu, 2019, www.gia.edu/diamond-history-lore. Shigley, Dr. J. (2019, June 6). Historical reading list: Diamonds in ancient India. Gemological Institute Of America. https://www.gia.edu/diamonds-ancient-india-reading-list Green, Will. The Sparkling Deception: How de Beers Convinced the World to Spend a Fortune on Engagement Rings. Marketing Made Clear, Oct. 2024, marketingmadeclear.com/de-beers/. Pangarkar, T. (2025, May 7). Lab grown diamonds market to hit USD 29.3 bn by 2033. Market.us News. https://www.news.market.us/lab-grown-diamonds-market-news/ Popova, Anastasia. The History of Diamond Traceability. Www.minespider.com , 22 Feb. 2024, https://www.minespider.com/blog/diamonds-supply-chain-from-diamonds-discovery-to-g7-rules Kimberley Process: Ensuring Conflict-free diamonds worldwide. Kimberley Process | Ensuring Conflict-Free Diamonds Worldwide. (n.d.). https://www.kimberleyprocess.com/ comments debug Commenting Forum Please be respectful and inclusive Please be respectful and inclusive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 2B | 901LawReview

    "Cyberbullying In America" By: Rashmi Surineni Collierville, Tennessee _________________ Introduction Nearly half of teens and adults in the US have experienced at least one form of online harassment. Name-calling, false rumors, and physical threats are only a few of the many types of cyberbullying inflicted upon victims whose mental and emotional health suffered greatly as a result. Victims often report increased rates of anxiety and depression, low self-esteem, isolation, anger, and even stress-related headaches. In the most severe cases, cyberbullying has been linked to self-harm and suicidal thoughts and actions, highlighting the severe damage and dangers of online harassment. Analysis What actions have been taken to protect the digital population from such atrocities? While no single federal law specifically addresses cyberbullying, all 50 states in the U.S. have laws or policies that cover electronic forms of harassment and bullying. However, these laws vary from state to state. In Tennessee, the words harassment, intimidation, or bullying is legally defined as any communication that maliciously intends to be a threat of harm to the victim, and that a reasonable person would perceive the communication to be a threat of harm (Tennessee Department of Education, n.d.). Therefore, the phrase “cyberbullying” simply means this form of bullying is undertaken through the use of electronic devices. In response to the harmful the effects of cyberbullying in schools, including interference with a student’s educational benefits, opportunities, or performance, Tennessee law has specific penalties in place, especially for minors. In Tennessee, cyberbullying is classified as a Class A misdemeanor, which falls under the same misdemeanor classification as harassment (Tennessee Department of Education, n.d.). A new law in Tennessee, effective July 1, 2025, mandates that minors found guilty of cyberbullying in juvenile court will receive a one year suspension of driving privileges. Convicted adults can face up to a year in jail, a fine of up to $2,500, or both. If the offense involves stalking, it can be elevated to a Class E felony, with a potential prison sentence of one to six years and a fine of up to $3,000. With such protective laws in place, it is clear that cyberbullying is a serious matter and a multi-faceted approach is essential to combat the related harms in order to maintain a safe, welcoming digital population. Conclusion To conclude, cyberbullying in the U.S. remains a significant challenge resulting in severe mental and emotional consequences for victims. In response, stringent state laws are in place, such as those of Tennessee, that provide legal recourse and penalties. Ultimately, through cohesive education and the enforcement of cyberbullying violations, the digital environment can be a safe, respectful place where every member is free to thrive for years to come. Bibliography Tennessee bullying, harassment, cyber-bullying laws title 49 education. (n.d.). https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/safety/bully_harass_cyber-bullying_laws.pdf Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs (ASPA). (2023, May 17). Tennessee anti-bullying laws & policies. StopBullying.gov. https://www.stopbullying.gov/resources/laws/tennessee comments debug Commenting Forum Please be respectful and constructive Please be respectful and constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 3 (Lauren) | 901LawReview

    "McNeil vs. Florida Law Enforcement" _______________________________ By: Lauren Cody Memphis, Tennessee _______________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Introduction : On February 19, 2025, 22-year-old college student William Jr. McNeil was stopped by officers from the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office on the road in Jacksonville, Florida. Sheriff's deputies reported that they pulled Mr. McNeil over for failing to turn on headlights and failing to buckle his seatbelt because it was raining, which does not add up because video footage released by his lawyer showed it was daylight at the time he was pulled over. Deputies also stated that his seatbelt wasn't on either. Law enforcement then asked Mr. McNeil to exit the vehicle, but he refused and locked his doors, asking the deputies to call their supervisors. He ignored about a dozen lawful commands before the officers proceeded to smash the driver’s side window, demanding him to exit the car, punched him in the face and then asked him to put his hands up to which he obliged to. This is when the situation escalates as the officer pulls him from the car, punches him repeatedly, and throws him on the ground, causing a fractured tooth, a concussion in the arrest, the need for stitches, and suffering short-term memory loss following the incident. Analysis : Officers reported that Mr. McNeil reached for a knife at the floorboard of the vehicle, however the video footage and McNeil’s legal team disputed this narrative, citing no visible threat. The State Attorney's Office for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of Florida declared in August 2025 that there will not be any charges pressed against the officers involved in the crime because their conduct was essentially not “harmful” enough to be considered a crime. I do not agree with this because the video evidence clearly portrays William McNeil as not aggressive with the officers, as he raised his hands in a form of defense and repeatedly asked for their supervisor, which they would not comply with either. Instead of the officers attempting to de-escalate the scene, they went further by engaging in a critical physical altercation and forcibly dragging him out of the vehicle. McNeil’s attorneys stated the officers had used an excessive amount of force on McNeil that was disproportionate to the crime, resulting in severe casualties and an unlawful decision regarding the enforcement personnel’s sentence, which was ultimately nothing. Since this event unfolded, Crump and Daniels have filed a federal lawsuit against the officers involved. This can be argued as a violation of McNeil’s civil rights and the 14th Amendment, as he resisted officers without violence yet was dealt with their brutality and a disgrace to the law enforcement system in their unconstitutional and excessive method of handling the situation. McNeil states that he is still recovering from the incident, stating, “I'm still afraid of police. I'm still frightened at night. I don't sleep still as much as I used to” (CBS News). Conclusion : Even in the instance that Mr. McNeil wasn't complying with state regulations of recording the altercation and refused to exit the vehicle, that still does not give the officers the right to justify such violent and excessive physical force when Mr. McNeil posed little to no threat, resulting in numerous charges on Mr. McNeil and not a single charge on the enforcement officers involved. This decision can be considered as disproportionate to the crime and the circumstances of the situation and can also be argued unlawful in honoring McNeil’s civil rights as McNeil's lawyers have voiced regarding this outcome. Bibliography : - CBS Interactive. (n.d.). Black Student Files Federal lawsuit after video shows Florida officers hitting him, dragging him from car during traffic stop. CBS News. (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/black-student-video-florida-officers-hitting-dragging-him-federal-lawsuit/) - Halpert, M. (2025, August 14). Prosecutors clear Florida officer who punched man in traffic stop. BBC News. (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq68z8e0v50o) - Scanlan, D. (2025, August 14). State attorney explains why Jacksonville deputies were cleared in violent arrest. WUSF. (https://www.wusf.org/courts-law/2025-08-14/state-attorney-explains-jacksonville-cops-cleared-violent-arrest) comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 10C | 901LawReview

    "Challenges in Criminal Law: Wrongful Convictions, Sentencing Disparities, and Deterrence" _______________________________ By: Syakera Almasi California _______________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Copy link Introduction: Criminal law is a complex and crucial area of law that deals with offenses against the law in society. Its purpose is designed to maintain public order, protect individuals and property, and punish those who violate established norms. However, criminal law is not without limits. Analysis: One significant problem is the potential for wrongful convictions. The justice system, despite its best efforts, is not infallible, and innocent individuals can be wrongly accused, tried, and convicted of crimes they did not commit. Factors such as mistaken eyewitness identification, coerced confessions, and flawed forensic evidence can contribute to these injustices.The consequences of wrongful convictions are devastating, leading to imprisonment, loss of reputation, what if someone is wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death. Another issue in criminal law is the disparity in sentencing. Studies have shown that individuals from minority groups and disadvantaged backgrounds often receive harsher sentences compared to their counterparts. This disparity raises concerns about systemic bias and discrimination within the criminal justice system. Factors such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status should not influence sentencing decisions, but they often do, perpetuating inequalities and undermining the fairness of the system. Addressing sentencing disparities requires a comprehensive approach, including reforms to sentencing guidelines, implicit bias training for judges and prosecutors, and efforts to address the root causes of crime in marginalized communities. Furthermore, the effectiveness of criminal law in deterring crime is a subject of ongoing debate. While punishment is intended to discourage criminal behavior, its impact on crime rates is not always clear. Factors such as poverty, lack of opportunity, and social inequality can contribute to criminal behavior, and addressing these underlying issues is essential for effective crime prevention. Additionally, the focus on punishment can overshadow the importance of rehabilitation and reintegration. Conclusion: Many offenders, particularly those convicted of non-violent crimes, could benefit from programs that provide education, job training, and mental health services. By focusing on rehabilitation, criminal law can help offenders turn their lives around and become productive members of society. Bibliography : Innocence project. Innocence Project. (2026, March 11). https://innocenceproject.org/ We change the way Americans think about crime and punishment. The Sentencing Project. (2026, February 25). https://www.sentencingproject.org/ comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 1B | 901LawReview

    "Children's Online Privacy and COPPA" By: Srishti Mulgund Collierville, Tennessee ______________ Introduction Data privacy is “the principle that a person should have control over their personal data, including the ability to decide how organizations collect, store, and use their data” (Kosinski & Forrest, 2025). Children and minors are particularly vulnerable to data collection, manipulation, misuse, and exploitation, making online privacy protections especially critical for this population. As children are exposed to digital platforms at increasingly younger ages, the absence of adequate legal safeguards can result in long-term harm, including unauthorized data profiling, targeted advertising, and exploitation (Livingstone et al., 2024). To mitigate risk related to minors online, the United States enacted the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) in 1998 to protect the online privacy of children under the age of 13 by requiring websites and online services to obtain parental consent before collecting personal information from minors (15 U.S.C. § 6502 (2020)). The key requirements of the COPPA Act are the following: (i) companies publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy, (2) obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting personal data of the children, (iii) allow parents to revoke consent and request the deletion of collected information, and (iv) maintain the confidentiality, security, and integrity of children’s data (EPIC, n.d., para. 3). COPPA created a basic framework for children’s online privacy, but fast-changing technology and new ways kids use the internet make us question if the law is still enough. While the Act provides important protections, it also has some limits that need to be looked at more closely. COPPA’s Protective Framework and Core Rights COPPA contributes to a safer digital environment for children by providing several rights to parents. One of its most important features is empowering parents by giving them greater control over how their children’s personal information is collected, used, and shared. By requiring parental consent, COPPA places adults in a gatekeeping role, enabling them to oversee and limit their children’s exposure to data-driven risks (Steeves & Mačėnaitė, 2023). This parental control also helps protect children from manipulative or inappropriate ads and lowers the risk of exploitation. By limiting data collection, COPPA pushes companies to design services for kids with privacy as a priority, rather than relying on surveillance-based business models (Zuboff, 2019). COPPA helps make sure companies are responsible for how they handle children’s data. When big platforms break the rules, they can face penalties. For instance, TikTok was fined for failing to inform parents and not getting their permission before collecting children’s personal information, which violated COPPA rules (Kern & Farrar, Aug 2, 2024; DOJ Press Release, Feb 06, 2025). These actions encourage companies to handle data responsibly and be transparent, which builds consumer trust. Overall, COPPA supports a culture of accountability and good data practices for organizations that work with young users. Structural Gaps and Emerging Challenges Despite these benefits, COPPA has some clear limits. One major issue is that it only covers children under 13, so teens aged 13 to 17 do not have the same federal privacy protections (Johnson, 2020). As more teenagers use social media, gaming, and AI-driven services, the lack of clear rules for this age group raises real concerns about data security, surveillance, and exploitation. Age verification is another problem. COPPA does not set a standard or reliable way to check a user’s age, and platforms cannot just trust what users say. This means children might give the wrong age, either by accident or to get around restrictions, which exposes them to the data collection COPPA is supposed to stop. Even when parental controls work as intended, they can seem too strict and limit access to useful educational or social resources online (Erickson et al., 2016). Because of these strict controls, many children find ways to get around the system. The Guardian reports that 32% of children aged eight to seventeen with a social media profile said they identified themselves as an age of 18 or older (Dan Milmo, 2022). This common workaround weakens COPPA’s effectiveness and shows a gap between what the law intends and how people actually behave. COPPA also causes problems in schools, especially when digital tools are used in the classroom. It is not always clear if parental consent is needed for data collection with educational technology, or who is responsible, including schools, parents, or service providers (Walker et al., 2023). Compliance Burdens and the Business Perspective For companies, following COPPA can be costly and complicated. They must set up strong data security, keep detailed privacy policies, and manage consent systems, all of which add to costs and legal risks. For small businesses and startups, these rules can make it hard to enter the market or may even stop them from creating digital services for children. However, it is important to safeguard the data privacy of children, even though protecting children can incur some costs. Therefore, there is a need for developing best practices and implementation guides that help organizations comply cost-effectively. Further, it is equally critical to update the law to address privacy issues emerging from novel technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence. Future Directions and Conclusion Recognizing these challenges, lawmakers have begun to propose legislation to modernize the Act to reflect contemporary technologies and usage patterns (Price, 2024). These proposed reforms may expand age protections, clarify consent requirements, and address emerging issues such as AI-driven data collection and algorithmic profiling. Updating the COPPA Act offers a unique opportunity not only to improve the digital privacy of children and minors but also to balance parental control and teen independence in the context of new technologies. As the online world evolves, the laws that protect its most vulnerable users must keep pace. Bibliography Kosinski, M., & Forrest, A. (2025, November 17). What is data privacy? . IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/data-privacy Electronic Privacy Information Center. (n.d.). Children’s privacy . EPIC. Retrieved January 10, 2026, from https://epic.org/issues/data-protection/childrens-privacy/ Price, T. (2024, April 26). Children and teens’ online privacy act pros and cons - the american consumer institute center for citizen research , from https://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2024/04/children-and-teens-online-privacy-act-pros-and-cons/ Milmo, D. (2022, October 10). Adult online age used by third of eight- to 17-year-old social media users. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2022/oct/11/adult-online-age-eight-to-17-year-old-social-media-users Justice Department sues TikTok and parent company ByteDance for widespread violations of children’s privacy laws . Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Sues TikTok and Parent Company ByteDance for Widespread Violations of Children’s Privacy Laws | United States Department of Justice. (2025, February 6). https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-tiktok-and-parent-company-bytedance-widespread-violations-childrens Kern & Farrar, (August 2, 2024). Press Release, FTC investigation leads to lawsuit against TikTok and ByteDance for flagrantly violating children’s privacy law. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/ftc-investigation-leads-lawsuit-against-tiktok-bytedance-flagrantly-violating-childrens-privacy-law Federal Trade Commission, & Federal Trade Commission. (2002). Protecting children’s privacy under COPPA: A survey on compliance. Retrieved July. 15 USC 6501: Definitions. (n.d.). https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title15-section6501&edition=prelim comments debug Commenting Forum Please be respectful and constructive Please be respectful and constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 1 (Thy) | 901LawReview

    "Human Need for Social Comparison" _______________________________ By: Thy Nguyen Collierville, Tennessee _______________________________ Copy link Introduction: Once as a kid, my mom took me to Walmart where she unfortunately made the mistake of letting me wander into the toy section. Now I may only have had a couple of pennies in my piggy bank, but you bet I was going to walked out that store with a $20 toy I had spontaneously wanted. Of course, being my mom, she wouldn’t let me do that (God forbid she lets her 8-year-old make bad financial decisions). So instead, she pulled me the side and explained how I should be more like my sister, who’s just so much more financially responsible and is already saving up for college. And while these weren’t the best grounds for comparison, since I was 8 and she was 16, this was still one of the earliest recollections I have of feeling down on my luck because there was someone out there who had something I didn’t. And that habit of comparing? It had quickly expanded to school, sports, and every part of my life. But luckily, it's not just me, because to compare is human nature. As the American Psychological Association puts it best, our innate ability to compare is a manifestation of people’ desire to “evaluate their abilities and attitudes in relation to those of others.” So while it was created with the intention of helping us survive in society, it has slowly become an increasing threat to the very lives within our society. In the hands of many, social comparisons have become the source of their growing low self-esteem and continued destructive behaviors. By letting this issue go unchecked, we may be enabling a generation to grow comfortable with comparing at the cost of their livelihoods. So to prevent it from consuming our lives, let’s analyze its causes, effects, and possible solutions for our predicament. Human Nature: To understand how the act of comparison has come to harm us, we must first understand its intentions to help us. According to German psychologist Thomas Mussweiler and Matthew Baldwin, an assistant professor at the University of Florida in 2018, “humans have developed elaborate systems of cooperation” far more complex than any other species. And “to…navigate this complex web of social interactions, we need to assess our and others’ social standing, strengths, and weaknesses.” Essentially, comparisons are made with the purpose of helping us better understand and cooperate with one another. But rather than embracing the idea of unity, comparisons have begun severing us apart for a rather simple reason. The problem isn’t fully the comparisons themselves, but the feelings that follow. Most infamously? Our innate feeling of envy. As Susan Fiske, a psychologist at Princeton University, explains, “feeling below someone makes people feel ashamed at their own inadequacy.” Humans are complex: we not only want to fit in but also need to feel like we belong. So when faced with a person who’s perceived to be more socially or financially well off, our ability to compare clicks in. And in accordance with its design, it tells us that compared to that person, we are lacking, reasonably causing us to feel a little resentment. And while this becomes motivation for some to improve themselves, for many, this only worsens their sense of humiliation and shame. Social Media: With the technology we have today, social comparisons have found its way from the screen into reality. Ever since Covid five years ago, when we were all pushed online as a means of finding connection in a time of isolation, we as humans have become more connected than ever before. But with people now being able to reach others further away, the audience for which our minds can compare ourselves to only continues to grow. This is all made possible by one of social media’s key specialties: the ability to curate the illusion of a perfect life. When we’re online, it seems that almost everywhere we look, being successful, rich, good-looking, and likeable all at the same time becomes the norm. And though it seems obvious that these are simply unattainable standards for the common person, it doesn’t stop our youth from taking the bait. In 2023, the CyberSmile Foundation found that out of all their Gen Z participants, a shocking 90% viewed their lives with negativity and dissatisfaction upon comparing themselves to others online. With how social media’s algorithm works, it’s not hard to see why. Social media’s algorithm runs on the community’s engagement, hence providing us with metrics like followers, comments, and likes. But ever so conveniently, all of these features happen to also serve as a quantifiable baseline for comparisons. Lowered mental health: When the standard is this high but the expectation to reach them is even higher, failure is expected. But rather than realizing these expectations were unrealistic in the first place, many instead blame themselves for simply not trying hard enough to reach them. Now although my 8-year-old self ignored what my mom said and got the toy anyways, her words still lingered in my mind, effectively building a sense of competition, with my own sister. As time passed, it had begun to seem that it was no longer just how better she was with money. Now, it was also how much better she was at academics, organizing, handling responsibility, just better. Compared to her, my achievements as nothing. Until one day, I stumbled across my mom scolding my sister, and speaking that eerily familiar phase: “You should be more like your sister.” And when I had asked my sister how she could just bear with that, she told me: “Being 8 years older than you doesn’t exactly make comparisons all that fair. To compare us would be like comparing the capabilities of a coughing baby to a nitrogen bomb, so just do what you can do, and I’ll do mine.” Those couple of sentences had knocked me out of a trance, effectively making me realize that I was comparing myself with someone else on an uneven playing field. I had never once considered our age gap, never considered how her interest in math helped her in academics, how her OCD made it so she couldn’t leave the house unless it was spotless, yet I still compared. Because that’s the true nature of comparisons: they are never as fair as they seem. Body dysmorphia: Unfortunately, for the many caught in the same mindset as I did, the effects are not only a loss of self-esteem but also a physical toll on the body. As social media continues to promote its version of an ideal body onto the public, one where women are especially held at unhealthy standard, not only will people’s perception of their own bodies worsen but also body dysmorphia. As an article on the National Library of Medicine in 2020 explains, not only do patients of BDD have to live with a distorted self-image but they also have [higher rates] of “social isolation, anxiety…depression, and suicide.” So, for every day we let it go untreated, comparisons will only continue to take more lives. So it only seems right that today we make a change. Comparisons as a tool: Now look, I can’t stop you from comparing, but what I can ask from you is to tweak the way you do it. An article from the Albert Ellis Institute tells us: “each one of us is a unique individual with characteristics and life events that are unique to only us.” The differences between two unique people are too large for any comparison to ever be fair, so instead of comparing ourselves to others, why not compare yourself to yourself? It can start with you from a year ago or even you from yesterday. Focus on how you’ve grown, how you’ve changed, the things you’ve learned. But what about the things you lack? Well, use it, as motivation to do better, to become an even better version of yourself tomorrow. Use social media as a place of connection, not comparisons: Just like our innate ability for comparisons, social media was also created with the intention of connecting and entertaining us, so let’s use it how it was intended. According to Dr. Erega, a Counseling and Community Outreach Specialist at The University of Texas in 2024, “instead of mindlessly scrolling and looking at what others have or are doing, send someone you know a private message.” Everyone is so unique, so why not use social media as a means to share our experiences with the world and forming genuine connections instead of trying to see whose life is better or worse? Conclusion: So yes, social comparisons are kind of bad, but that’s only if we let them be. And how better can we stop them from hurting us anymore, than by making the change in our minds today. ___________________________________________________________________________ Bibliography: - American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Apa Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. (https://dictionary.apa.org/social-comparison-theory) - PNAS. (n.d.-b). (https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1721555115) - Fiske, S. T. (2010, November). Envy up, scorn down: How comparison divides us. The American psychologist. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3825032/%20%20%E2%80%8B) - Exploring the impact of social comparisons on gen Z. Cybersmile. (2024, July 1). (https://www.cybersmile.org/2023/06/16/exploring-the-impact-of-social-comparisons-on-gen-z/) - Himanshu, Kaur, A., Kaur, A., & Singla, G. (2020, February 28). Rising dysmorphia among adolescents : A cause for concern. Journal of family medicine and primary care. (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7114025/) - Ink, S. (2014, July 31). The dangers of comparison. Albert Ellis Institute. (https://albertellis.org/2014/07/the-dangers-of-comparison/) - How can I stop comparing myself to others?. The UT Austin International Student Scholar Services Blog. (2024, April 12). (https://isss-blog.global.utexas.edu/2024/04/how-can-i-stop-comparing-myself-to-others/) comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 6C | 901LawReview

    "Sharing is Caring" _______________________________ By: Megna Sivaraja Collierville, Tennessee _______________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Copy link Intro: During 5th grade, I was a somewhat, dare I say, successful owner of a side hustle at school. And while it may not have been the most legal business, I didn’t think anyone would’ve minded a 10-year-old making some extra cash to buy herself more candy. However, the only exception to this was, unfortunately, my parents. When they found out, they took all the money I had made and only gave a twenty back, lecturing me that it was selfish of me to have wanted all of it. And this was just the start of it. From academics to food, somehow, I was labeled the most selfish person in the world, simply because I was hesitant to give. And as time went on, I couldn’t help but wonder to myself: what is selfishness in the first place? According to the American Psychological Association, selfishness is the “Tendency to act excessively or solely in a manner that benefits oneself, even if others are disadvantaged” (APA 2018). At its core, selfishness is an unwanted trait within human behavior. However, the bounds of what can be considered selfish have been so utterly twisted by society that basic boundaries and self-consideration have been equally deemed “selfish.” And should society continue with this stigmatization of selfishness, it will only feed into a cycle of shame. Environment: If we must discuss selfishness, then we must begin with the when and why people have been called selfish. In The National Library of Medicine, a study regarding psychological selfishness explained in simple terms, that people act selfishly when the situation calls for it, even if it prevails the “social expectations for the situation.” (NLM 2022). The original perception of selfishness was built by one’s own feelings of being wronged by someone else who acted upon their own self-interest. Of course, such behavior should be shamed when the situation calls for cooperation and mindfulness for others, however, the situations where most are often called selfish do not require this consideration. Instead, the problem lies in the fact that calling someone else selfish has become a way to shame and ridicule them, regardless of whether it is true. Human Nature: But even with disregard for the situation, we cannot ignore the fact that selfishness is simply an inherent trait. Philosopher Adam Smith explains that, by nature, every person is better at taking care of themselves than anyone else. (Princeton Press 2021). So, while showing regard for others is necessary for a functioning society, we mustn’t forget that humans will always, instinctively, put themselves first. And it’s important that I reiterate this: this instinct isn’t something to be ashamed of. However, unrealistic expectations for people to act on the majorities’ best interest has caused many to feel as though putting themselves first was considered blasphemous. As a result, we fear this instinct. We fear that our attempts to preserve ourselves are only a nuisance and that we are nothing but “selfish” for putting ourselves first. Effects on Women: And unfortunately, the biggest target of these “selfish” titles make up 49% of the population: women. The patriarchy is no doubt still prevalent within society and misogyny hasn’t “mellowed out”, it has simply become sneakier, quieter, and through snide remarks rather than blatant comments. Look nowhere better to use as an example than when the topic of women having children is brought up. The idea of being a “childfree woman” has been so deeply frowned upon by society that simply carrying this title names these women as selfish. But in fact, The National Center of Health Statistics presents that there has only been a 3% decrease in general fertility in the United States since 2022. So when you consider the fact that these childfree women are a minority, it becomes less of a population issue and more of a societal one. As said best by Peggy Heffington, an assistant instructional professor at UChicago, “women have been actively controlling their fertility for a very, very long time,” and it’s not some modern phenomenon (Heffington 2024). Personally, I have absolutely no plans to have children, but I am one of the lucky few who has a say to my own body. For many women, they are repeatedly told to consider society’s plans for them first and their own will for themselves second. Heffington explains that for many, “a woman not having children is sort of an offense or a violation of her civic duty” (Heffington 2024). This harmful rhetoric is what has pushed women to have children, even if they had no desire to. Should we keep accusing these women of being “selfish”, we’ll only create unprepared mothers and continue a generational cycle of shame and self-hatred. Mental health: Another notable target demographic of these “selfish” labeling are people who struggle with mental health. Those suffering from depression are often told by others that suicide and self-harm should never be an option. And while that is true, the persistent rhetoric that these actions of self-harm are nothing but “selfish acts done without the consideration of others,” rather than actions made from a time of instability, does nothing to sway the mentally unwell from them. The Alliance of Hope Organization affirms this, stressing that, “when a person is battling with their demons and feeling hopeless, their thinking is often significantly distorted” and they often end up thinking about “how others will not really miss them once they’re gone” (Alliance of Hope Organization 2024). Instead of reassurance, calling these acts selfish only causes more guilt and shame to grow. Solutions: While it’s hard to avoid this degrading title, there are still ways we can change that. When my title as the “selfish child” within my family first extended beyond just a couple bucks I made in elementary school, I thought that prioritizing myself was only a burden to others. However, the active minds organization says otherwise, stating that “to invest in our communities and incite change, we must first fill our own cup.” By fearing that every action we take may be “selfish” we set unnecessary limits. So slowly, I realized that my decision to put myself first wasn’t going to kill my parents, even if they act like it will. We need to stop burying our own emotions under the need for approval because all of us, whether we like it or not, are a little bit selfish. So, be proud of your decision to not have kids, and maybe have the money that you’ve saved from not having kids go towards charities. Be proud in establishing your own boundaries for you can now build stronger trust in your relationships. This stronger bond will go on to create a stronger sense of community, and what is society if not a bundle of diverse communities united. After all, care for society begins with the care of ourselves, and if being a little selfish is what’s necessary, then so be it. Conclusion: Now I’m not suggesting that we should just completely disregard everyone else’s feelings, but I’m simply imploring you to be just a tad kinder to yourselves. After all, it isn’t a sin to put yourself first. Bibliography : American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Apa Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/selfishness The Trustees of Princeton University. (n.d.-b). Notes. Princeton University. https://press.princeton.edu/ideas/on-self-interest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). U.S. fertility rate drops to another historic low . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/releases/20240425.html Why are more women saying no to having kids?, with Peggy O’Donnell Heffington. University of Chicago News. (n.d.). https://news.uchicago.edu/why-are-more-women-saying-no-having-kids Alliance Of Hope. (2025, August 9). Is suicide selfish? understanding the suicidal mind: Alliance of hope. Alliance of Hope for Suicide Loss Survivors. https://allianceofhope.org/is-suicide-selfish-understanding-the-suicidal-mind/ MS;, C. R. C. M. (n.d.). Psychological selfishness. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436157/#:~:text=However%2C%20these%20characterizations%20offer%20limited%20insight%20into,disregards%20prevailing%20social%20expectations%20for%20the%20situation comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 1C | 901LawReview

    "Fantasies That Linger: Hidden Influences of Childhood Imaginations Later in Life" _______________________________ By: Shruti Mandavilli Germantown, Tennessee _______________________________ Copy link Introduction Children often create imaginary worlds or characters when they’re feeling stressed, lonely, or overwhelmed by tough feelings. Imagination, in general, is a good thing, but the way that children use their imagination may influence the way that they think about power, control, and conflict. In almost all cases, this will influence the way that they think as adults. Children frequently use their imagination to escape when they feel overwhelmed or lonely. This helps them feel safe, and it gives them a sense of power over their feelings. As some researchers have stated, “The mind resorts to fantasy to avoid confronting uncomfortable truths or stressors that are too challenging to handle directly” (Rounds 2024). They utilize their imagination to give themselves a quick escape from the things that are overwhelming them. This is especially true for children who have experienced trauma. In fact, research has even stated that children who have experienced trauma at an early age are more likely to use their imagination as a way to cope with the things that overwhelm them.However, the downside is that the worlds they create may not necessarily be possible in real life. There may then be a gap between what they want and what is actually possible. Rather than imagination itself being the issue, it is the unresolved trauma behind it; healthier coping methods such as emotional support, communication, or therapy can help children process these feelings in a more realistic way. What this may lead to is disappointment, frustration, or even resentment. What this may then do is shape their attitude towards problems, which may not always be positive, as long-term trauma can affect emotional regulation, increase sensitivity to stress, and influence how individuals respond to conflict later in life. Some of the fantasies that children may have are about control, revenge, or dominance. Children may often feel that they have no control. They may feel that they have no say over their environment or the actions of people around them. What they may then do is fantasize about situations where they may regain control and respect. “Children use revenge fantasies to disavow their inability to act (and mourn) and disguise their feelings of shame” (Maidenberg 2021). In this situation, they may then regain their pride and resist accepting feelings of guilt, shame, or responsibility, instead holding onto the belief that they are not powerless. Revenge fantasies may be common, dwelling on this may shape one’s attitude towards justice and authority. In fact, “revenge fantasies can be obsessive thoughts” (Maidenberg 2021). However, if these trends continue over the years, they could influence how a person reacts to anger, humiliation, or rejection. In other words, instead of resolving a conflict through peaceful means, the person could start to view aggression or retaliation as a way to restore their pride or control. This, in turn, could lead to harmful or distorted patterns of thinking, such as justifying harmful actions or struggling to manage conflict in healthy ways. As the person believes their behaviors were justified as a response to the humiliation or anger they faced. While imagination may lead to negative thinking, it could also play a role in helping the child develop empathy and emotional awareness. When a child imagines different roles or creates imaginary friends, they practice taking the perspective of another person. According to studies, “children who have imaginary friends are better able to take the perspective of another person” (Smith 2007). This ability to take the perspective of another person helps them realize how their behaviors might impact other people. Another site mentions that, “boys and girls alike can develop empathy and caregiving behavior by developing their imaginations” (Rounds 2024). As they experience various roles and personalities, they also begin to understand concepts such as emotions, kind-heartedness, responsibility, and compassion. Empathy is an important quality to have since it helps prevent negative actions and promotes positive decision-making. Children who exhibit empathy at an early age are less likely to engage in harmful or unlawful behaviors since they are aware of the impact their actions may have on others. Experiences such as bullying, traumatic events, or isolation can greatly affect the emotional development of a child. These experiences “can lead to a loss of joy and creativity, withdrawal from activities, or a preoccupation with reliving the traumatic event” (Desautels 2025). In response to this, many children often resort to fantasy as a coping mechanism for their traumatic experiences. Fantasy can be described as the creation of imaginary stories or outcomes. It helps the child process their experiences and regain control over their lives. According to research, “imaginative play can provide an opportunity for sustainable, flexible, and healthy changes in the developing brain” (Desautels 2025). Although, in some cases, such a coping mechanism may go too far. A paragon of such an occurrence is that of maladaptive daydreaming. Such a condition often results from a traumatic experience. In such cases, an individual may resort to creating imaginary situations where he/she feels dominant, respected, or secure. While such fantasies may provide momentary relief from emotional distress, an over-reliance on such coping mechanisms is often not a conscious choice but rather a response shaped by unresolved trauma, which may make it hard for an individual to cope with real-life situations. Such occurrences may lead to harmful patterns of thinking in an individual’s future, as he/she may struggle with managing emotions or conflict in healthy ways. This highlights how deeply these coping mechanisms are rooted in pain, showing that individuals in these situations often need understanding and support rather than judgment. The difference between healthy imagination and harmful fantasy, therefore, lies in moderation. Experts have explained that “while fantasy can be a helpful temporary escape, over-reliance on this defense mechanism can be detrimental.” If people are too focused on fantasy, they might not be dealing with the real issues that are causing their distress. This “can prevent individuals from addressing the underlying issues causing their distress” (Rounds 2024). Therefore, frustration and hopelessness might continue to build. In some cases, people might start to believe that drastic measures are necessary to solve their problems or to regain a sense of control over their lives. This kind of thinking might lead to a criminal mentality where people believe that their actions are justified. Even so, fantasy itself is not a negative thing. In fact, “pretend play and imaginary characters are often a healthy sign of resilience and creativity” (Smith 2007). When children learn to use fantasy as a way to deal with the real world, fantasy itself becomes a positive thing that helps with emotional development rather than a negative thing that promotes harmful ways of thinking. Fantasy and imagination are an important part of childhood development. However, repeated fantasies of revenge, control, or escaping reality may, at times, shape the way people think about control and conflict as they get older. If these behaviors continue to occur, they may lead to aggressive attitudes and harmful patterns of thinking, especially when individuals struggle with the gap between what they imagine and what is possible in real life, but it is important to recognize that these coping mechanisms are not a choice and often require guidance, support, or professional help such as therapy to be addressed in a healthy way. By understanding the role of childhood fantasy and its effect on emotional responses, individuals, educators, and caregivers can better recognize when imagination is being used as a coping mechanism and take steps to support healthier emotional development and healing, as well as encourage early intervention and open conversations about mental health. Bibliography : Desautels, Lori. “How Imaginative Play Can Help Young Children Heal From Adversity.” Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/imaginative-play-helps-children-trauma/. Maidenberg, Michelle P. “The Intrigue of Revenge FantasiesWho is prone to them, what role they play, and how to effectively heal.” Physcology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/being-your-best-self/202104/the-intrigue-revenge-fant asies. Rounds, Cody Thomas. “Fantasy: Living in a Fantasy World to Escape Reality.” PsychAtWork Magazine Insight That Moves You Forward. https://www.codythomasrounds.com/psychatwork-magazine-article/fantasy-retreating-into-a-mak e-believe-world. Smith, Jermey Adam. “Imaginary Friends.” Greter Good Magazine. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/imaginary_friends . comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  • Publication 8C | 901LawReview

    "Don’t Weed Your Garden" _______________________________ By: Sofia Su Collierville, Tennessee _______________________________ Copy link I don’t weed my garden. And no, not because I’m lazy. This confession often confuses my neighbors, who take great pride in their manicured lawns and pristine flower beds. They see my lush, green space and assume I’ve simply fallen behind on my chores. But the truth runs much deeper than mere procrastination. My refusal to weed stems from this underlying idea of fairness that has taken root in my mind and refuses to let go. Those so-called weeds have names. We just never cared to learn them because they’re so common—to the point that we don’t think they’re ever going to go extinct. We see them pushing through cracks in the sidewalk, spreading across vacant lots, and carpeting fields with their determined presence. Their abundance has made us blind to their individuality, their history, their very right to exist. We have reached the point that we think it’s annoying how well they adapt to harsh environments. Instead of marveling at their resilience, we curse their persistence. We hate their vitality but overlook the genes that survived centuries with the help of natural selection— genes that have weathered droughts, floods, insects, and ice ages long before we ever cultivated our first garden. Is it the fault of the bramble seed to grow where the wind takes it? Does the clover deliberately send its runners into the rose bed? Does the dandelion conspire to land in the center of your lawn? No, the fault is ours when we fail to see the good qualities. The fault lies in our refusal to look beyond our narrow definitions of beauty and usefulness. Rubus fruticosus, or more commonly known as brambles, famously known for being fully edible. Brambles have been traditionally used to make jams, wines, and teas to treat diarrhea, sore throat, and dysentery. For centuries, our ancestors welcomed brambles into their hedgerows, harvesting their fruits and medicines with gratitude. When did we decide that their generosity was actually greed? But brambles are just the beginning. Take clover, for instance, with its trifoliate leaves and delicate white or pink flowers. Trifolium repens, as botanists call it, has been cursed by lawn enthusiasts for generations. Yet this humble plant works miracles beneath our feet. Clover is a nitrogen-fixer, hosting bacteria on its roots, transforming atmospheric nitrogen into a natural soil fertilizer. It stays green all summer without watering, feeds hungry bees with its nectar, and when you walk on it barefoot, its softness rivals any spiky grass lawn. Children sought four-leaf clovers for luck, never realizing that every three-leaf clover was already lucky—lucky enough to enrich the earth itself. Then there’s Taraxacum Officinale, or the dandelion, contain rich vitamins A, C, and K and can be consumed in salads or tea to promote digestive health and liver function. Those bright yellow blooms of beauty nodding in the spring sunshine are not just cheerful—they are nutritious medicine. Every inch of the dandelion, from root to flower, offers something valuable. Yet, we want to weed them out from our garden, flower by flower, root by root until they don’t exist in our garden anymore. We spend millions of dollars on chemicals designed specifically to destroy them, poisoning our soil and water in the process. But if everyone does this—if everyone weeds their garden with ruthless efficiency, eliminating every bramble, every clover, every dandelion—and they don’t exist in anybody else’s gardens, they’ll eventually go extinct. Maybe then we can start to see their value. But by then it will be too late. We have created a hierarchy in our minds where rarity equals worthiness. We fail to see that these species are extinct because of our own actions; and the only way to stop the cycle is to recognize the origin instead of doing damage control when it’s too late. We cannot keep destroying what is common today only to mourn it tomorrow. This idea that some species should be destroyed simply because there’s too many is dangerous. When we look at historical tragedies of genocides, it stems from the same idea. We single out a specific species or race, label them as all bad, and convince ourselves that they are better gone. I do not make this comparison lightly. The pattern of thought is what concerns me—the ability to devalue life based on abundance, to justify eradication based on inconvenience. If we can look at a living thing and decide it deserves to die simply because it grows where we don’t want it, we have embraced a logic that has led humanity to some of its darkest moments. We can look at these plants just like how we look at people. Everyone possesses good qualities that we can learn from if we just open our eyes to the good things instead of just the bad. Every person, like every plant, has a story, a purpose, a reason for being exactly where they are. Instead of looking for reasons to hate, we can choose to love and learn from those around us. Next time when you go to your garden, don’t frown upon the luscious plants. Instead, appreciate them for teaching us persistence, resilience, and ambition. See in the bramble their determination. See in the dandelion their beauty. See in the clover their hard work and humility. The weeds, as we call them, have as much right to the sun and rain as the vegetables I plant. Sometimes more, because they arrived first. They were here long before we decided which plants deserved protection and which deserved poison. My garden teaches me that fairness can be found in the choices we make every day. The choice to destroy or appreciate. Bibliography : Bramble medicine. Whispering Earth. (2016, August 26). https://whisperingearth.co.uk/2010/09/23/bramble-medicine/ Woodland Trust. (n.d.). Bramble (Rubus fruticosus). https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/trees-woods-and-wildlife/plants/wild-flowers/bramble/ Weeds, begone: 42 Common Weeds You Might Find In Your Yard & How to Control Them. (n.d.-c). https://www.thespruce.com/pictures-of-weeds-4069715 Wikimedia Foundation. (2023, August 22). Digitaria sanguinalis. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digitaria_sanguinalis Pfaf Plant Search. (n.d.). https://pfaf.org/USER/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Digitaria%2Bsanguinalis Forfarmers UK - organic options to manage Soil Health & Capture…. (n.d.-b). https://www.forfarmers.co.uk/news-knowledge/organic-options-to-manage-soil-health-capture-nitrogen Philmeeks. (2023, November 1). There is a helpful weed? by Anna-Grace Fraley. Grow Appalachia. https://growappalachia.berea.edu/2023/10/27/there-is-a-helpful-weed-by-anna-grace-fraley/ Dandelion Culinary & Health Benefits. Seedway. (n.d.). https://www.seedway.com/dandelion-culinary-health-benefits/ Ovadje, P., Ammar, S., Guerrero, J.-A., Arnason, J. T., & Pandey, S. (2016, November 8). Dandelion root extract affects colorectal cancer proliferation and survival through the activation of multiple death signalling pathways. Oncotarget. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5341965/ Hill, K. (2026, March 27). The beauty of bramble. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/67264927@N05/48132934078/ comments debug Commenting Forum Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Please keep dialogue respectful & constructive Share Your Thoughts Be the first to write a comment.

  2025 901 Law Review. All Rights Reserved. 

This publication is created and managed by high school students for educational purposes.  

The views expressed are those of the student authors and do not represent legal advice or the views of any institution or professional organization.

bottom of page