top of page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

"Vanishing Libraries"
By: Sofia Su

 

Library Bookshelves View

_________________
 

 

Introduction

      The argument that physical books should be replaced by digital books is one of efficiency, and
on that metric, it is flawless. Digital texts are searchable, portable, and cost-effective. Yet, this
logic mistakes the function of a book for its purpose. A book’s purpose is not merely to transmit
information, but to facilitate a particular state of mind—one we cannot afford to lose. 

 

Analysis

      A physical book is a temporal anchor. Its weight in your hands, the texture of its paper, and your progress through its pages create a relationship build on time and thought. You cannot, with a
frantic flick of the finger, skim Pride and Prejudice. You are forced to reckon with its scale, to
feel the heft of its digressions. This physicality imposes a patience that digital media actively
subverts. The hyperlink, the notification, the seductive ease of switching tabs—these are the
architecture of a distracted mind. The codex, by contrast, is a technology for sustained, deep
attention. It builds a silent, sacred chamber for thought in a world of cognitive noise.
Furthermore, a physical book is an historical artifact of a singular intellectual journey. My used
copy of The Prince is not the same as the one on a screen. It is scarred with my own frantic
marginalia, but also with the faint, penciled-in notes of a previous reader—a stranger with whom
I now argue and occasionally agree across decades. This creates a palimpsest of interpretation; a
community of readers bound in a single object. A digital file is sterile and universal while a
physical book is unique, bearing the material evidence of its own life in the world. To replace the

physical book with the digital imposter is to believe that the medium is a neutral vessel. It is not.
The medium shapes the conversation we have with the text itself. 

 

Conclusion

      By substituting physical books with online imitations, we are not just phasing out paper and ink; we are phasing out a specific, irreplaceable ecology of the mind—one that cultivates depth,
patience, and a connection to the lineage of human ideas. In our rush toward a more efficient
future, we must be careful not to optimize away the very conditions for positive association and
concentration.

Bibliography

MiddleWeb. (2025, December 9). Reigniting the magic of reading physical books. https://www.middleweb.com/52885/re-igniting-the-magic-of-reading-physical-books/ 

Barshay, J. (2022, August 29). Proof points: Paper books linked to stronger readers in an international study. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-paper-books-linked-to-stronger-readers-in-an-international-study/

Commenting Forum

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.

  2025 901 Law Review. All Rights Reserved. 

This publication is created and managed by high school students for educational purposes.  

The views expressed are those of the student authors and do not represent legal advice or the views of any institution or professional organization.

bottom of page